Search for: "STATE v FLOWERS"
Results 201 - 220
of 841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
The second action came in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 4:53 am
Per the order list published Friday, the US Supreme Court declined an appeal from a Washington State-based florist who refused to sell flowers to a same-sex couple. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 3:17 am
Supreme Court, by a vote of 6-3, denied review in the long-running case of Arlene's Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
In Carson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:50 am
In Europe the theory of positive state obligations has reached its full flowering with the theory of horizontal fundamental rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 9:30 am
The California Supreme Court held the following: “Because application of [due care] is inherently situational, the amount of care deemed reasonable in any particular case will vary, while at the same time the standard of conduct itself remains constant, i.e., due care commensurate with the risk posed by the conduct taking into consideration all relevant circumstances (Flowers v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:14 am
In Europe the theory of positive state obligations has reached its full flowering with the theory of horizontal fundamental rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 22 June, the Supreme Court will hear East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:06 am
In Duberstein v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
Certainly proponents f a thousand legislative flowers blooming take comfort in the expectation that variaitons will be minor and eventually there will be convergence. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:46 am
In Flowers v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:30 am
Close-up photo of a cluster of cherry blossom flowers at sunrise. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
That left the state law claims in the wrong court, so the case was remanded to the state court. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 3:33 pm
Langer v. [read post]
