Search for: "STATE v MCKENZIE"
Results 201 - 220
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 11:07 am
From Doe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:27 am
Strong On August 4, 2011, a preliminary award on jurisdiction was rendered in Abaclat (formerly Beccara) v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
McKenzie (08/06/10) (SDNY) (Hon. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:42 am
A decision in the Ohio case, Smith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
Watson’s McKenzie Friend in these proceedings) lives, I am told, in Germany although she has a flat in London. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Interestingly, the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court (Fulford LJ and Leggatt J) permitted a McKenzie Friend, Dr Michael Pelling, to make representations on his behalf. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 11:00 am
The clearest example was United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
Perhaps the great unregulated covet such things instead of actual qualifications, like this McKenzie friend with his “proper solicitors briefcase”? [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am
Platsas, University of Derby (England) · A Romanian Epistemology of Legal Transplant: The Theory of ”Forms without Substance” Manuel Gutan, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (Romania) · Expanding Legal Geographies: A Call for a Critical Comparative Approach, Alexandre Kedar, University of Haifa (Israel) IV.B Mixed Jurisdictions in… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
“In October 2010 when the father, in concert with a friend who purported to be his McKenzie Friend, abducted B. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
So if you take the United States – one can quibble about where one draws the line – but the First Amendment is the guiding principle that has guided the development of the cause of action. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:50 am
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
In a year when at least one parent and one campaigner had been held in contempt of court for breach of that law (albeit a breach of a specific injunction rather than the rules per se – see Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2376, the last in a series of judgments in that case [update 5 July : in fact there is a later judgment Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2498 which deals with the question of whether the court could make a suspended order on an application to… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]