Search for: "STATE v VISSER" Results 201 - 212 of 212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Jonathan Santman (Brinkhof)
If the applicant shows that he is registered as patent proprietor in the national registers of the relevant Contracting Member States (as 10x Genomics did in this case), there is a rebuttable presumption that he has standing to sue. [read post]
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
But if a court can determine that an offer is not FRAND, it presumably could also state wh [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:53 pm by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Romania will become 18th member state in September. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that the participating States in the UPC and UPCA agreement are not the same and that, in the case of the UPCA, they are not all EU Member States. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am by Grégoire Desrousseaux
During the parliamentary debates, it was stated that this text was in line with “the spirit of the Civil Code and European texts“[15]. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
You can't slice up a priority rightToday we have the  first instance decision in the opposition against European patent 2771468 having the title "ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMS, METHODS AND OPTIMIZED GUIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR SEQUENCE MANIPULATION" (PCT/US13/74819). [read post]
The most famous decision might be the UK Supreme Court’s Ruling in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd, which was reported on this blog here. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The appellant’s representative answered on June 23, 2008, stating that he was acting on behalf of Zenon Technology Partnership. [read post]