Search for: "STATE v. ACKERMAN" Results 201 - 220 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2008, 11:53 pm
Ackerman, 38 Haw. 53 (1951) (eminent domain statutes construed against the taker); City of Oakland v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  ”Kim Kreis, et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 It is worth noting that Bruce Ackerman's important rendering of the the New Deal as a "constitutional moment" amending the Constitution outside Article V in effect requires ignoring, or at least diminishing the relevance, of McCulloch. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "Assuming that the legal malpractice causes of action accrued more than three years before this action was commenced (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 543; Melendez v Bernstein, 29 AD3d 872, 872; Alicanti v Bianco, 2 AD3d 373, 374), nevertheless, the complaint adequately alleged that the plaintiff was "left with the reasonable impression that [Levinson] was, in fact, actively addressing… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” ““A legal malpractice claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of actionhave occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court’” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002], quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Frye that offers new insight on U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm by David Super
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
In The Atlantic, Bruce Ackerman and Ian Ayres contend that the Court’s recent decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Available Data Reflects Only A Small Decrease – Hartford, CT lawyer Wystan Ackerman of Robinson & Cole on the firm’s Insurance Class Actions Insider Shaking Up Pharmaceutical Marketing to Physicians: $3Billion Settlement Imposed Standards and Transparency Far Beyond Sunshine Act – Poughkeepsie attorney Linda Terner of Iseman, Cunningham, Riester & Hyde on the firm’s blog, Health Care Integration Advisors IRS Going For The Gold: Do Olympic Medal… [read post]