Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL"
Results 201 - 220
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 12:05 pm
" The essay carefully draws some important lines between federal courts and federal law on one hand and state courts and state law on the other and concludes: "One Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
”) But as one of us explains today in a Justia column (and as Justice Ginsburg’s majority opinion in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm
As far back as 1973, Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The SG relies principally on Alaska Airlines v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Writing in dissent in Comptroller v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm
Bush v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:24 pm
Bush v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:23 am
That's the headline on a May 20, 2020 WaPo article by lawprof Sanford V. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
This seems to be the prevailing view from Michael McConnell, Akhil Amar, Jeffrey Rosen, Mark Movsesian, David French, and others. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
Akhil Amar has argued that the NPVIC would be constitutional. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
