Search for: "STATE v. HARRINGTON"
Results 201 - 220
of 452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 9:49 pm
Contents include:ArticlesJoanna Harrington, Exploring the "Canadian" in the Canadian Yearbook of International Law Marie Ghantous, Les mesures conservatoires indiquées par la Cour internationale de Justice dans le cadre de conflits territoriaux et frontaliers: Développements récents Ryan Liss, The Abuse of Ambiguity: The Uncertain Status of Omar Khadr under International Law Véronique Guèvremont, La reconnaissance du pilier culturel du… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:57 am
United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Harrington, 726 F.3d 921, 932 (7th Cir. 2013) (because "the state court’s decision denying post-conviction relief violated § 2254(d)[]," it was appropriate to consider de novo "the evidence presented at the federal evidentiary hearing"); Stitts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
” Coming to us from the Land of the State-on-Top Habeas Petition is Hoffner v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
My preview suggested that Monday’s argument in Law v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:25 pm
McAninch can condemn a state court’s harmless-error decision as “so lacking in justification that there was an error well understood and comprehended in existing law beyond any possibility for fairminded disagreement,” Harrington v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
Last month the Supreme Court of Mississippi handed down its 6-3 split opinion in the matter of Harrington v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
And then SCOTUS added a gloss in Harrington v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
McClellan, 12-1480 (after five relists), prompting a dissent from Justice Alito (joined by Justice Scalia), arguing that, contrary to the Sixth Circuit’s “serious misreading” of Harrington v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
H-Net adds some interesting reviews this week, including one of David V. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:30 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
Carey v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
