Search for: "STATE v. MCKENNA" Results 201 - 220 of 384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Laura McKenna discusses Endrew F. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
  However, the abstract merely stated that the combination was additive. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 6:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (McKenna v Forsyth & Forsyth, 280 AD2d 79, 83 [4th Dept 2001].) [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Individuals tend to fare worse (.65 v. .74 for use, .27 v. .37 for ITU). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
McKenna: European economists did try to demonstrate empirically that TM registrations were associated with firms that they thought were innovative; they made those claims in causal terms, though they were probably showing that successful firms with new products often registered TMs. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:15 pm
Ted Frank has a good round up of analysis on the potential problems spots at Point of Law; And Howard Erichson reports on a plaintiffs-only conference to discuss the settlement;From the miscellaneous category: New York State practitioners should take note of a reversal in Raffellini v. [read post]