Search for: "STATE v. VIDAL"
Results 201 - 220
of 270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
It is no surprise then that the Court of Appeal in Vidal-Hall were unpersuaded. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
A Canadian cloud makes every email and download abroad subject to CASL -> Competitive Keyword Advertising Permitted As Nominative Use–ElitePay Global v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
This issue did not need to be decided upon in CG v Facebook Ireland because the DPA was found not to apply. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
For example, in Quinton v Peirce & Cooper ([2009] EWHC 912 (QB)), where a DPA claim was added to libel and malicious falsehood claims, Eady J said: “I must now turn to the Data Protection Act. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
The first point arises from the relationship between the new tort of misuse of private information (recently recognised in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311) and the HRA. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Furthermore, a specific obligation on Member States to establish such rules has also not been laid down”. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:02 pm
Justice Mitting had decided to stay that part of the claim until the appeal in the case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall had been decided (the appeal was decided on 27 March 2015 and it will be discussed in a following post). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
Ten months on from the 13 May 2014 ruling of the Grand Chamber of the European Court in Case C131-12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja Gonzalez, Google has received 234, 384 requests for removal of links and evaluated 850, 385 URLs. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
In 2013 it paid US$17 million to settle US state consumer-based actions brought by State AGs. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
Second, there was the important data protection decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Court of Appeal on Implied Waiver of Privilege: Do Process LP v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
On 2 and 3 March 2015, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) will heard the appeal in the case of Vidal-Hall v Google. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 am
At a time when the courts are increasingly having to address complex data protection arguments (see, for example, Mosley, Hegglin and Vidal-Hall) , we should not forgot how useful a subject access request can be in obtaining pre-action disclosure, enabling an individual to see whether s/he has a legitimate basis for issuing a claim in due course. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
The parts of the DPA claim concerning sections 13, which may depend on proof of damage, were also stayed until the determination of the pending appeal in Vidal-Hall –v- Google. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
