Search for: "STATE v. WOODS" Results 201 - 220 of 2,663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
The date of the certification of the candidate for appointment rather than the date a candidate's name is reachable for appointment controls Matter of Woods v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 2:30 pm by Brian Y. Silber
To determine whether the encounter between Woods and the police was consensual or investigatory, the appeals court considered the "totality of the circumstances" as was done by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
In effect, the Proposed Regulations say they are reversing the resultin United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:12 am
Candidate on military duty must be eligible and reachable for appointment for name to be placed on a special military list following dischargeMatter of Woods v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am by Amy Howe
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Gnango, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1691 (26 July 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) LK v Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust [2010] EWHC 1928 (QB) (15 July 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Wood v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] EWHC 1769 (Admin) (30 June 2010) Nursing and Midwifery Council v Okon- Burgess [2010] EWHC 1816 (Admin) (05 July 2010) Medical Justice, R (on the… [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:03 pm
First, notice that the State actually prevailed below. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
 Professor Lorna Woods of the University of Essex explains some key aspects of the judgment. [read post]