Search for: "STATEN v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
At the time of his accident, the Staten Island plaintiff was not utilizing an available order selector provided for use in retrieving furniture at higher levels. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
At the time of his accident, the Staten Island plaintiff was not utilizing an available order selector provided for use in retrieving furniture at higher levels. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:22 pm
The Supreme Court decision in Janus v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In 1878, in Reynolds v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:54 pm
The court is mindful of the decision of Zeek v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:22 pm
The facts are simply stated in the complaint. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:46 am
In the case at hand, The State of New Hampshire v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:52 pm
See US Bank National Association, v Flatbush Extension LLC, et al., Index No. 26434/09. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am
Thus, a petitioner is entitled to obtain the identity of prospective defendants where a petitioner has alleged facts, which state a cause of action (see Matter of Toal v Staten Is. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
But in Duamutef v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 3:51 am
That case is People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
” (Proposition [Prop.] 1986/87:143 at 64; See also Statens Offentliga Utredningar [SOU] 1986:22 at 108). [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
The case, which had appeared to be a slam dunk for the prosecution, had its oddities.
Newly Named Interim Dean Is First Woman to Lead Hofstra Law
New York Law Journal
Professor Nora V. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
A Staten Island Probate Lawyer said that, the Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's motion as to both defendants, and granted those branches of Wildflower's cross motion which were for summary judgment on its cross claims and its third-party cause of action. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 6:19 pm
The landmark case of Guggenheimer v Ginzberg sets forth the guideline that whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action, thereby defeating defendants' motions, the court will consider whether the plaintiff has a cause of action rather than whether he has properly stated one. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:05 pm
In People v Lopez, an undercover narcotics officer approached defendant and who were standing outside a building located 420 feet from a public school in Bronx County. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
In 2007, many of the restrictions had been struck down by a federal judge in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Then, in a case of first impression, McKithen v. [read post]
