Search for: "Salerno " Results 201 - 220 of 300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Playtime Theaters, Inc., or whether the state must conduct its own empirical analysis that is both jurisdiction- and category-specific in order to meet the requirements of Due Process; and (3) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that Proposition 100 was facially unconstitutional, contrary to Salerno's requirement that a statute is facially invalid only if “no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid,” because among those categorically denied… [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am by Maureen Johnston
Playtime Theaters, Inc., or whether the state must conduct its own empirical analysis that is both jurisdiction- and category-specific in order to meet the requirements of Due Process; and (3) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that Proposition 100 was facially unconstitutional, contrary to Salerno's requirement that a statute is facially invalid only if “no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid,” because among those categorically denied… [read post]
  Why is there no mention of Salerno and no inquiry into whether “no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid”? [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:01 pm
Salerno, the Act would be invalid in any set of circumstances to which it might be applied. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
[Some people arrested in Portland for misdemeanor failure to obey a lawful order have had these conditions imposed as a condition of being released before trial. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Salerno (1987), holding that a law could only be challenged on its face if "no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:11 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“It’s an experience that you just pray to God every day that you just don’t ever have to enter into,” Salerno told reporters. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am by Maureen Johnston
Playtime Theaters, Inc., or whether the state must conduct its own empirical analysis that is both jurisdiction- and category-specific in order to meet the requirements of Due Process; and (3) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that Proposition 100 was facially unconstitutional, contrary to Salerno's requirement that a statute is facially invalid only if “no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid,” because among those categorically denied… [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:59 am by Michael Froomkin
Pat Salerno, the former City Manger not only ignored them, he denied there were any broken sidewalks in Coral Gables, and a campaign was born. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Playtime Theaters, Inc., or whether the state must conduct its own empirical analysis that is both jurisdiction- and category-specific in order to meet the requirements of Due Process; and (3) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that Proposition 100 was facially unconstitutional, contrary to Salerno‘s requirement that a statute is facially invalid only if “no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid,” because among those categorically… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Michael Froomkin
And continuing to support Salerno after he was caught misleading the Commission is just totally unacceptable to me. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:51 pm
  This was perfect music for Salerno-Sonnenberg, who likes to lose herself so totally in the music that she is practically dancing. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm by Orin Kerr
The Court reasoned that under Salerno, a facial challenge could not succeed unless it was shown that all facts covered by the statute would be unconstitutional. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Playtime Theaters, Inc., or whether the state must conduct its own empirical analysis that is both jurisdiction- and category-specific in order to meet the requirements of Due Process; and (3) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that Proposition 100 was facially unconstitutional, contrary to Salerno's requirement that a statute is facially invalid only if “no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid,” because among those categorically denied… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:56 am by Paul Cassell
Relying on the Supreme Court's earlier decision in Salerno, we explain that a State can categorically deny bail based on the charged offense if it can show that defendants charged with that offense categorically present "a continuing danger to the community. [read post]