Search for: "Samuel Graves" Results 201 - 220 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm by Alden Abbott
(This point was made in a 2021 law review article by former FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra and current FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Samuel Levine.) [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm by Mark Walsh
” She announces that Justice Samuel Alito is the fifth vote in the judgment, but she doesn’t attempt to characterize his short opinion. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Moria Miller
For example, [Chief Justice John] Roberts wrote a concurring opinion joined by [Justice Samuel] Alito in Citiz [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
” Describing that holding as “unprecedented,” the government told the justices that “the decision is causing immediate, grave, and ongoing harm to public safety, national security, and the enforcement of our laws. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am by Colby Galliher
Then-Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justices John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Clarence Thomas, put forward the argument that eventually prevailed in Sackett: Namely, that wetlands and waterbodies that have no surface connection to navigable, CWA-protected waterbodies are not WOTUS and thus do not qualify for CWA protections. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Proponents of nitrogen hypoxia as a means of carrying out death sentences and even euthanasia in humans and other animals claim it leads to a quick death.Evidence from Alabama’s execution of Smith calls those claims into grave doubt. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
(APPLAUSE) JEFFREY BROWN: As the president spoke, Justice Samuel Alito appeared to mouth the words "Not true. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Former Australia fast bowler Geoff Lawson is reportedly being sued for defamation lawsuit after he alleged that West Indies all-rounder Marlon Samuels was involved with gangs in Jamaica. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:47 am by Emma Snell
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have granted Ward’s request. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Roberts(Plurality, concurrence)John Paul Stevens(Principal Dissent)Antonin Scalia(Concurrence)Anthony Kennedy(Plurality)Clarence Thomas (Joins Scalia)Ruth Bader Ginsburg(Joins Stevens)Stephen Breyer(Second Dissent)Samuel Alito(Plurality, concurrence)Sonia Sotomayor(Joins Stevens)Does Buono have standing to challenge the cross in the first place? [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:15 am
"What, pray, was the remedy for this grave social ill? [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:58 pm
Posteriormente hubo dos gobiernos, de 1970 a 1982, en que la economía también creció a una tasa del 6 por ciento anual pero con graves desequilibrios macroeconómicos, es decir, con inflación y endeudamiento. [read post]
“Impeachment for conduct that destroys or gravely impairs presidential legitimacy. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
While the former star officer is not above the law, a representative argument reads, “it is understandable for Golsteyn to conclude that he had to kill the bomb maker” to quash the seemingly grave and immediate threat the suspect posed to Golsteyn’s troops and his mission. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:38 am by centerforartlaw
By Divya Srinivasan The photographic documentation of the deceased body has occurred for decades. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
A late complication has arisen unfortunately concerning a Tudor painted roof/ceiling, which, although it will not affect the grant of the faculty may impact on the precise timing of the commencement of works which is dealt with in the Conditions”, The petition sought permission: (i) to install lavatories in the north transept in an area near to the organ, (ii) to enclose the chapel space in the eastern bay of the north transept to create a sound-proof room which can be heated… [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Samuel Alito described himself as “somewhat baffled” by Letter’s statement, in response to a question from Ginsburg, that “the protection against the use of a subpoena for harassment” of the president is “simply the assessment whether the subpoena is relevant to some conceivable legislative purpose. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm by Kevin Russell
Effectively leaving parties who cannot alter their past conduct to the mercy of majoritarian politics and risking the possibility that unpopular groups might be singled out for this sort of mistreatment—and raising along the way, too, grave due process (fair notice) and equal protection problems. [read post]