Search for: "Samuels v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am
Samuel Alito apparently hasn’t learned that saying nothing may be the best way of saying something significant. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm
The question came to the court in the cases of two men, Jean Francois Pugin and Fernando Cordero-Garcia, both permanent residents of the United States who had lived in the country for decades. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm
Any injuries he suffered occurred in Russia and could not constitute a domestic injury in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
In today's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am
” The policy at the center of the case, United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:51 pm
ShareIn Smith v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
Elizabeth Prelogar, Solicitor General of the United States Hon. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Guest Post by Samuel F. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:03 pm
Justice Samuel Alito also dissented, joined by Thomas. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
United States, which limits the scope of identity theft under a federal criminal statute. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:06 am
United States, No. 22-10. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:47 am
Dist. of California (9th Cir. 1983) (holding that "pretrial documents, such as those dealing with the question whether [the defendant] should be incarcerated prior to trial … are often important to a full understanding of the way in which the judicial process and the government as a whole are functioning"); United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:04 am
In Escobar v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:45 am
The Court’s opinion in Sackett v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am
In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito writes that the Clean Water Act “extends to only those wetlands with a continuous surface connection to bodies that are ‘waters of the United States’ in their own right,’ so that they are ‘indistinguishable’ from those waters. [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:32 am
Samuel JenkinsIn United States v. [read post]
