Search for: "San Jose California Supreme Court" Results 201 - 220 of 659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:12 am by Jon Ibanez
The First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco relied on the 2006 California Supreme Court ruling of People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:43 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Yesterday the California Supreme Court heard oral argument in Briggs v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:16 am by GJEL Staff
By speaking with a San Jose personal injury lawyer and filing a lost wages claim, you can seek the financial compensation you deserve. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:02 am
Morris (1922-2012) Special SessionsSpecial Session of the Supreme Court, Fresno, California, October 8, 2002Special Session of the Supreme Court, San Jose, California, December 2, 2003Special Session of the Supreme Court, San Diego, California, December 7, 2004Special Session of the Supreme Court, Redding, California, October 5, 2005Special Session of the… [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:15 am by Robin Shea
Last we heard, President Trump is done with rewrites — he plans to take the battle to the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Their last filing with Judge Koh in San Jose said there was no progress regarding a settlement. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm by Richard Burt
Flightways Manufacturing, Inc. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 754, the California Supreme Court held that Corporations Code § 313 “applies even when the other party should have, but does not have, actual knowledge of the officers’ lack of authority, that party is relieved of the burden of establishing justifiable reliance upon the authority of the executing officers. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm by Richard Burt
Flightways Manufacturing, Inc. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 754, the California Supreme Court held that Corporations Code § 313 “applies even when the other party should have, but does not have, actual knowledge of the officers’ lack of authority, that party is relieved of the burden of establishing justifiable reliance upon the authority of the executing officers. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm by Richard Burt
” Citing the California Supreme Court’s opinion in People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm by Richard Burt
” Citing the California Supreme Court’s opinion in People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:11 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Today, the California Supreme Court decided a case of interest to all of our friends who work for the government, City of San Jose v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:28 am by Cyrus Farivar
Enlarge / Facade of the Supreme Court of California, as seen on October 2, 2016. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 10:42 am by Dave Maass and Mark Rumold
EFF joined the ACLU in filing an amicus brief in this case, asking the Supreme Court to overturn an appellate court ruling in favor of the City of San Jose. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
        CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 4 CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]