Search for: "Sauer v. Sauer"
Results 201 - 210
of 210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2008, 6:25 am
In Crooms v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:44 am
Barnett v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
Grasso, P.C., 210 AD2d 671; see also Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 444 n 3; Meyer v Glynn, 278 AD2d 291; Butler v Brown, 180 AD2d 406). [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
(see e.g., Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:56 am
Hinshaw reports on Rudolf v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 11:00 am
Paris banged up ... again [The Sun - UK] Roper v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 9:11 pm
Says Hans Sauer, intellectual-property counsel for the Biotechnology Industry Organization in Washington: "We're not totally thrilled. [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:25 am
That's not "damage," that's more like a windfall to us.Talk about having your cake ....For a copy of the the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer (AD2)For a copy of the Court of Appeal's decision, please use this link: Rudolf v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:17 am
In NFL v. [read post]
