Search for: "Savage v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
United States) prohibits such blanket interception. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
After this phone call, Savage and Spaw hung up their respective phones. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:35 pm
The Court of Appeal affirms.The best case for the plaintiff was probably a Ninth Circuit case, applying California law, that held that the United States was liable for the sexual assault by an immigration officer on an applicant for asylum. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
United States, in which the Court held that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague, “is a huge deal in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
United States and argues that “the lopsided win illustrates the need for a federal statute defining the default mens rea (guilty mind) to be proven in criminal cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
United States, involving a “meaty Speech or Debate clause” issue. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
United States, a major ruling on military commissions. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
United States, in which the Court recently heard reargument on whether the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm
United States, the Supreme Court is reconsidering the scope of the 1980s Armed Career Criminal Act which adds a 15-year prison term on armed career criminals. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
As Charlie Savage (among many others) has noted, the President thinks that not closing GTMO “endangers national security,” and the Islamic State beheadings of Americans have been tied to GTMO. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
Yesterday’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:24 am
” At Slate, Judith Schaeffer looks back at comments about Loving v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case in which the Court ordered re-argument in January. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:18 pm
He savages (that’s the only word for it, really) the Secretary of State’s position on the first question. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Wells noted the opening of a week-long hearing in the military commission case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
