Search for: "Say v. Baker" Results 201 - 220 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  One, State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Ronald Mann
Baker finally gave Microsoft its “day in court,” more than two years after the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
BLUF: Listen closely to everything a judge says off-the-record, and judges shouldn't say things off-the-record they wouldn't want on-the-record.United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In other words, the baker had more reason to think then that he was acting within the bounds of the law than he might, say, now, after Obergefell. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note… [read post]