Search for: "Sells v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 15,583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 11:31 am by The White Law Group
  The misleading filings violated FINRA Rule 1122, Article V, Section 2 of FINRA’s by-laws, and consequently, FINRA Rule 2010. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From the Complaint filed Thursday in Avodah Farms v. [read post]
” An appended letter to Senator Wyden from Ronald Moultrie, the Under Secretary for Defense and Intelligence and Security in the Department of Defense (DOD), stated that Moultrie was: …not aware of any requirement in U.S. law or judicial opinion, including the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” In reality, Rule 1.8.5(a) does state the general bar on such payments. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
Moreover, the enumerated terms are all items that JLM might conceivably sell to the public and appear to be presumptively copyrightable. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The drug price-fixing conspiracy – which became the focus of investigations by the Department of Justice, 49 state attorney generals, and Congress– has embroiled the generic pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:06 am by Unknown
SEC staff have previously denied no-action requests seeking to exclude similar proposals (Exxon Mobil Corporation v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 am by Rebekka Thomas (Bristows)
NOCO has a first party relationship with Amazon, meaning that Amazon buys products directly from NOCO to sell on Amazon’s own account. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]