Search for: "Shah v. Shah"
Results 201 - 220
of 604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court ultimately dismissed the petition and Plaintiff appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 28 NY3d 244, affirm the lower court's ruling, explaining that a "writ of mandamus"* is an extraordinary remedy that lies only to compel the performance of "an administrative act positively required to be done by a provision of law. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court ultimately dismissed the petition and Plaintiff appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of County of Chemung v Shah, 28 NY3d 244, affirm the lower court's ruling, explaining that a "writ of mandamus"* is an extraordinary remedy that lies only to compel the performance of "an administrative act positively required to be done by a provision of law. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Mr Adil Shah is a Pakistani national. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:24 am
That is the length of Chancellor Bouchard’s characteristically detailed and thorough post-trial opinion issued last week in Acela Investments v DiFalco, C.A. [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 7 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Agar sued more than a dozen individuals and entities, including Sanjay Shah and Pandurang Nayak, who they alleged sold Agar's technology in the scheme to produce the knock-off products. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Panel – Ethical and Legal Challenges in a “Right to Try” World Moderator: Patricia Zettler, Georgia State University College of Law, Developments at FDA: Expanded Access and Investigational Medicines as Treatment Holly Fernandez Lynch, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Protecting Patients from Right to Try Erin Talati Paquette, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Nusinersen as a Paradigm for Emerging Therapies: How Ethical Challenges of Expanded Access… [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:42 am
Where an advocate-witness’ testimony would be cumulative, it is necessarily unessential and a motion to disqualify is properly denied (Shah v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 1:48 pm
Hashemi’s life took a dramatic turn in 1979 when a revolution ousted the Shah and Iran became an Islamic nation under the rule of the religious and political leader Ayatollah Khomeimi. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Trans-Atlantic Perspectives, (Ecclesiastical Law Journal 20 (2018): 339-41).Cekli Setya Pratiwi, The Permissible Scope of Legal Limitation on Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) and Freedom of Expression (FoE) under International Human Rights Law (IHRL): The Study of Blasphemy Cases in Indonesia,(January 9, 2019).Prakash Shah, Sacerdotal Violence and the Caste System: The Long Shadow of Christian-Orientalism, (Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 302/2019).Brendan… [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:52 am
At the granular level, the case, Azar v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:31 am
Co. v North American Specialty Ins. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
The Court’s majority opinion in LeadingAge New York, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
Writ of Mandamus2018 NY Slip Op 07694, Court of AppealsIn this action the Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division's dismissing the Plaintiffs' petition seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the New York City Police Department and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene to enforce certain laws.The court explained that a writ of mandamus "is an extraordinary remedy 'that is available only in limited circumstances,'" citing Matter of County of… [read post]
