Search for: "Sharpe v. Light"
Results 201 - 220
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Justice Birss’s rulings in Varian Medical Systems AG v (1) Elekta Limited; and (2) Elekta Holdings Limited [2016] EWHC 2679 (Pat) cases. [read post]
15 May 2010, 12:22 am
The other three are Williams v MGN Ltd [2009] EWHC 3150 (QB) and Lonzim Plc v Sprague [2009] EWHC 2838 (QB) and Budu v BBC [2010] EWHC 616 (QB). [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
In light of the reduction of her award of damages to $600,000 from $3.5m Rebel Wilson has lodged an appeal with the High Court to restore the original ruling of Judge John Dixon and the corresponding award of damages. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
In Lopez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
Some more from Justice Brennan in Garrison v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:19 pm
The Plaintiff lost control and entered an intersection against a red light. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Clear branding and sharp market focus do not seem to have been key features of late. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
Sharp, 441 S.W.3d 448, 451 (Tex.App. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
On September 12, Littler Shareholder Walter Hunter outlined a number of concerns facing higher education institutions in light of recent National Labor Relations Board developments. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:02 am
The differential was not sharp or especially jagged. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
The LSE Blog has considered whether studying lived experience – without losing sight of its social, technical and political dimensions – can shed light on the tensions between desires of expanded experience and technological transparency. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
(ii) The judge misdirected himself in refusing to award costs because the outcome was not obvious from the outset.Permission to appeal was given in light of Bahta.I’ll turn to the specific points on this case at the end of this note, including the basis of the arguments. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
(ii) The judge misdirected himself in refusing to award costs because the outcome was not obvious from the outset.Permission to appeal was given in light of Bahta.I’ll turn to the specific points on this case at the end of this note, including the basis of the arguments. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
" In the recent case holding of Casborn v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am
Sims – and in Knick v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 11:52 pm
§ 1295 (a)(1) and therefore no jurisdiction"Acumed LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
In Rodriques v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:30 pm
The longstanding dispute over the use of the MERCK trade mark around the world is set to continue for the foreseeable future as the Court of Appeal of England and Wales remitted various issues back to the High Court in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1834. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 6:05 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
