Search for: "Shelby County Government" Results 201 - 220 of 495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2016, 1:15 pm by Abdo Law Firm
This extensive analysis is based upon our firm’s experience in handling drug crimes throughout Macomb County, especially in the 41-A District Court (Shelby Township, Utica, Macomb Township, Sterling Heights), 41-B District Court (Clinton Township, Harrison Township, Mount Clemens), 42-1 District Court (Romeo, Washington Township) and 42-2 District Court (New Baltimore, Chesterfield Township). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:44 pm by Amy Howe
The North Carolina legislature enacted the law in the wake of the Court’s 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm by Edward Blum
Shelby County, in turn, effectively put an end to preclearance. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:19 am by Mark Hartsoe
Some time thereafter, the Circuit Court of Shelby County granted summary judgment to MLGW on the basis that it had no actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition that allegedly caused the original plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:19 am by Mark Hartsoe
Some time thereafter, the Circuit Court of Shelby County granted summary judgment to MLGW on the basis that it had no actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition that allegedly caused the original plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:19 am by Mark Hartsoe
Some time thereafter, the Circuit Court of Shelby County granted summary judgment to MLGW on the basis that it had no actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition that allegedly caused the original plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am by Alexandra Gutierrez
The Court was not persuaded by Verrilli’s argument in defense of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:15 am
  These voter restrictions are the result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 7:26 am by Andrew Koppelman
  So far from offering any remedy for these abuses, the Roberts Court licensed them, in its extraordinary gutting of the Voting Rights Act by a 5-4 margin in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:52 am by David Gans
  In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling three years ago in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 5:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
At the outset, the court granted Shelby County’s motion to dismiss, given the lack of involvement of Shelby County in the consideration and subsequent enactment of ZTA 15-001. [read post]
4 May 2016, 2:37 pm by David Schraub
But it is difficult, given the prevailing sentiments of the majority in cases like Parents Involved or Shelby County, to imagine the current Supreme Court making that argument with a straight face. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
   The Court didn’t issue its decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:10 am by David Gans
”  In 2013, in Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 11:08 am by David Gans
”  Alito’s dismissal is in line with past cases, such as Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the Section 5 coverage formula in Shelby County, tribes should consider proactive measures to ensure that tribal citizens can participate in elections. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That decision was left intact by the Justices in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]