Search for: "Shepard v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 4:00 pm
” Apprendi v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:40 pm
The Sixth Circuit made clear that Lagosabrogated the holding of United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:43 am
Shepard in 2010. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
Rockwell International Corp.Docket: 10-1377Issue(s): (1) Whether state substantive law controls the standard of compensable harm in suits under the Price-Anderson Act, or whether the Act instead imposes a federal standard; and (2) whether, if a federal standard applies, a property owner whose land has been contaminated by radioactive plutonium, resulting in lost property value, must show some physical injury to the property beyond the contamination itself in order to recover for damage to… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:34 am
PSIRs are not documents available for review under Shepard. * United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 1:04 pm
Norris v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:33 am
Shepard, C.J., and Dickson, J., concur. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
Clark v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:08 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse points out what appears to be a factual error in the Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
Ed. 2d 607 (1990) and Shepard v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:51 am
I would affirm the trial court's order.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
Shepard, 10-925, for CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
Lesher Fein, Such, Kahn and Shepard, PC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am
While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:13 am
While this proposition has seldom been addressed, the 1997 ruling in English v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:53 pm
The article discusses a recent California district court decision, Lenz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
Shepard, C.J., concurs with separate opinion. [read post]
