Search for: "Sinclair v. Sinclair"
Results 201 - 220
of 373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2009, 4:09 pm
Elle Belle, LLC, 85 USPQ2d 1090 (TTAB 2007) (use alleged for a wide variety of clothing items for men, women and children when mark had not actually been used for any identified items for men or children); Sinclair Oil Corporation v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:33 am
Its functions were therefore plainly judicial in nature and it was also noted that the Court of Appeal had previously decided that the LVT and Lands Tribunal were courts for the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention (R (Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington Ltd) v Lands Tribunal [2005] EWCA Civ 1305).The Divisional Court decided to exercise their discretion and make the order. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:33 am
Its functions were therefore plainly judicial in nature and it was also noted that the Court of Appeal had previously decided that the LVT and Lands Tribunal were courts for the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention (R (Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington Ltd) v Lands Tribunal [2005] EWCA Civ 1305).The Divisional Court decided to exercise their discretion and make the order. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:18 am
SINCLAIR BLACK AND D. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
: 09-076/09-090/09-091 Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
" Id., following Sinclair Refining Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 4:49 am
As the New Jersey Supreme Court made clear in Sinclair v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
The court relied upon Sinclair v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 11:36 am
" There is, of course, the oft-quoted statement from Sinclair Oil Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 10:00 am
Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:15 am
Sinclair and the trademark case BidZirk v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:14 pm
Sinclair. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:55 am
Sinclair v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 am
The published decision is Wintermute v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:23 pm
The deceased held the land at death for the use and enjoyment of the beneficiaries of the trust, and not for himself.Madam Justice Prowse made this decision in Graham v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 11:00 pm
This is not believed to be a record.November - The Government announces that it is considering banning Facebook, after the latest statistics reveal that the social networking site was not mentioned in only one divorce in the last year.December - The Supreme Court hands down its judgment in Smith v Smith, in which it is severely critical of delays in the family justice system. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:26 am
See Sinclair v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Michael Alvarez and Betsy Sinclair) Beyond the Margin of Litigation: Reforming U.S. [read post]
