Search for: "Smart v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by David Klein
On March 15, 2024, a United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in the matter of Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:25 am by Kenneth Odza
Can the food business in the United States function effectively with individual courts and states determining their own common law (or even statutory) rules for product labeling? [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
United States, 529 U.S. 334, 338 (2000)).Montgomery v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 6:54 pm by Larry
The plaintiff purchased Sprinter vans in the United States and exported them to Canada. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Florian Mueller
While the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit gave every indication at a December hearing that the grossly erroneous non-copyrightability holding in Oracle v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 10:44 am by Florian Mueller
One of the candidates for "Antitrust Trial of the Year 2023" is the upcoming United States et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994); Carson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:14 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of KentuckyOpinion Date: 12/17/09Cite: Carrier Vibrating Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:24 am by Holly
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ruled that the Corporate Transparency Act is unconstitutional in National Small Business United v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 7:36 am by Gene Quinn
Almost two months ago, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm by Aubrey Mandus
Boudreau On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument on the question of what type of dialing equipment qualifies as an “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm by Aubrey Mandus
Boudreau On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument on the question of what type of dialing equipment qualifies as an “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
United States Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 479 F.3d 994, 996 (9th Cir. 2007) (Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of Lowdermilk posted on July 30, 2007); Blockbuster, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am by SHG
But believing is enough to make a lot of otherwise smart people lose their minds. [read post]