Search for: "Smith, Appeal of" Results 201 - 220 of 10,313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Edith Jones wrote for the majority, joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Elrod, Southwick, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Thus, even if Chutkan refuses to reconsider the constitutional issues on Smith’s appointment, she will be hard pressed to hold a trial before the election and even harder pressed to make it stick on appeal. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Cannon concluded that special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:02 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Anthony Panebianco is a shareholder with Davis Malm, the ILN’s member firm for Boston, Massachusetts. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Jack Smith essentially has the powers of a U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 8:03 am by Eugene Volokh
" I hadn't written about the case, though, because at that point it was sealed, pending the outcome of the Fifth Circuit appeal and follow-up District Court activity. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:15 am by Danny Glover
The recent North Carolina Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
Jack Smith will be firmly ensconced in the Hague to finish the prosecution he could not finish here. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:30 am by Beatrice Yahia
A spokesperson for Smith’s office yesterday confirmed that the Justice Department has approved plans to appeal. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm by Adam Klasfeld
” Carr did not explicitly signal whether Smith would pursue that appeal, when prosecutors would file one, or where they would file it. [read post]
Nor do the Special Counsel’s strained statutory arguments, appeals to inconsistent history, or reliance on out-of-circuit authority persuade otherwise. [read post]