Search for: "Smith v. Burden"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
Caglayan Orge Saylan v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:15 am
In C.F. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:54 am
Smith; dissent by Steele). [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 6:28 pm
Although Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Smith v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
Arguably, Justice Smith has turned the tables, shifting the burden of finding relevant material from the disclosing party to the receiving party, using 21st century tools and applying them to a laborious 19/20th century task. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 11:32 am
That changed when the Ninth Circuit decided Smith v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
Is it the burdens versus benefits balancing test from Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
Is it the burdens versus benefits balancing test from Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:50 am
Plaintiff failed to identify his religion or indicate whether access to a quiet sanctuary burdened his religious beliefs.In Navarro v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
Indeed, in its opinion the Court majority acknowledged once more that "[i]t is certainly true that in applying RFRA 'courts must take adequate account of the burdens a requested accommodation may impose on nonbeneficiaries.'” (quoting Cutter v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Here, the defendants failed to sustain their initial burden of demonstrating that the plaintiff's physical or mental condition is "in controversy" in this action (see Koump v Smith, 25 NY2d at 297; McConnell v Santana, 30 AD3d 481, 482; Lombardi v Hall, 5 AD3d at 740; Navedo v Nichols, 233 AD2d at 379). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:07 pm
’” Lepis, supra, 83 N.J. at 157 (quoting Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:05 pm
It's a fairly minimal burden in the scheme of things. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
In many respects this “tell them about the valuation process you followed” approach reminds me of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:14 am
Motion, 7:16-17, citing Christensen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
As expected, the government focuses on the first issue—whether plaintiffs have a privacy interest in telephony metadata collected under the Section 215 program—contending that finding such requires disregarding Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:02 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 6:42 am
In Smith v Barrow, the Fifth Circuit upheld a district court's application of strict scrutiny to a public school official's refusing to consider a teacher for a promotion unless she moved her kid from private religious school to public school. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
See Smith, Priscilla J., Is the Glass Half-Full? [read post]
