Search for: "Smith v. Deem" Results 201 - 220 of 1,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 2:49 pm by Josh Blackman
It cleanly presents an issue this Court deemed cert-worthy in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm by Josh Blackman
She wrote that history did not justify overruling Smith, but text and structure might. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm by Jim Oleske
Smith, a landmark 1990 decision holding that the free exercise clause does not provide a right to religious exemptions from neutral and generally applicable laws, or (2) sharply limit the impact of Smith by turning a caveat the Smith majority used to distinguish a prior case — the “mechanism for individualized exemptions” reading of Sherbert v. [read post]
For more information on developments in these areas or their impact on your business, please contact Betty Graumlich at bgraumlich@reedsmith.com, Noah Oberlander at noberlander@reedsmith.com, or the Reed Smith lawyer with whom you normally work. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm by Shea Denning
  A suspect may not be deemed dangerous merely because he or she has a weapon. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am by Jim Oleske
Supporters argued that the theory had roots in Smith itself (specifically its explanation of the earlier Sherbert v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Beck of the Philadelphia office of Reed Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Smith v Smith, --- F.3d ----, 2020 WL 5742023 (5th Cir., 2020) Colin David Smith filed a petition under the Hague Convention asserting that Sarah Elizabeth Smith wrongfully removed their children from Argentina to Texas. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am by Chukwuma Okoli
”[9] Under Canadian PIL, the traditional common law principles are recognized such that a foreign court will be deemed to have jurisdiction if the defendant submitted to the jurisdiction of that court[10] or where the defendant was resident[11] or present[12] in the territory of the foreign court. [read post]