Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 201 - 220
of 751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2023, 7:59 am
Earlier Remand Generated Second Final Rule That earlier remand faulted the three agencies that authored the initial rule, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Employee Benefits and Security Administration (EBSA), for using what the court saw as a de facto rebuttable presumption in favor of the QPA during the arbitration process and effectively putting a thumb on the scale in favor of insurers during… [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
In the U.S., the commercial producers are well on their way to replacing general practitioners. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm
But instead of overturning Smith, the Court said that Philadelphia’s anti-discrimination policies did not constitute generally applicable law. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 4:27 pm
Co., 33 F.3d 226 (3d Cir. 1993); Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicaid Services: CUTS IN MEDICAID HOME SERVICES WILL HURT LOUISIANA, SUIT SAYS, Pitts v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Service Performance Group, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Ellis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Rev. 1727-1817 (2010).Smith, Craig. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
That general agreement on first principles may explain why the court already has several significant religious liberty cases on its docket for next term. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:02 am
Herbert Smith to Freeze Pay and Cut up to 84 Jobs
Legal Week
Herbert Smith has announced a redundancy consultation Monday, with up to 84 positions facing the ax. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm
By any reasonable standard, this is data remarkably similar to the phone data in Smith v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:00 am
Myers, Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Arconti v. [read post]
