Search for: "Smith v. Judges" Results 201 - 220 of 5,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2010, 2:48 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The majority opinion is by Judge Milan Smith; the dissent is by Judge Bybee. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am by Benjamin Wittes
On the merits, I agree with Judge Pauley that—at the lower court level, at least—there is just no way around the fact that Smith v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:37 am by constitutional lawblogger
The panel - - - Judges Reinhardt, Hawkins, and NR Smith - - - reversed the decision of... [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
A funny coincidence: The panel opinion, which Judges Ho and Jones would have had the court reconsider en banc, was joined by Jim's other former judicial boss, Judge Jerry Smith. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
However, it does form the background for the decision in Convatec v Smith & Nephew [2011] EWHC 2039 (Pat), handed down this morning by HHJ Birss – the Judge having discarded his usual Patents County Court hat for the matter and donned that of a Judge of the High Court.When but a kitten, one of the first things that one learns about tearing around the place with reckless abandon is the fact that most inanimate objects simply cannot be trusted. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:01 am
 Judge Smith's dissent begins by saying:"I respectfully dissent. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Dennis Aftergut
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:57 am
I agree with Judge Milan Smith in this one. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 3:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith (D.R.I.); Judge Smith expresses his disapproval of D.C. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:34 pm by Dwight Sullivan
There were two issues in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:56 am
 In his dissent (joined by Judges O'Scannlain, Tallman, Callahan, Ikuta and Randy Smith) from the denial of a petition for rehearing en banc.There are some cases in which the original opinion stands for itself, and fully responds to a later dissent from denial of rehearing en banc. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:02 am
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, Smith, Inc., 395 F.3d 25; 2005 U.S. [read post]