Search for: "Smith v. Municipal Court" Results 201 - 220 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
The material is presented in the context of current law concerning liability against municipalities for constitutional violations of a person’s fourth amendment rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
The material is presented in the context of current law concerning liability against municipalities for constitutional violations of a person’s fourth amendment rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
The material is presented in the context of current law concerning liability against municipalities for constitutional violations of a person’s fourth amendment rights. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am by Zachary Price
Four years earlier, the Supreme Court had floated this “equal sovereignty” idea in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
Grosse Pointe Park    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:51 am by Hannah Kris
Steve Vladeck discussed Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s views on Morrison v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association   Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-9379; Smith v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:05 am by Dylan Gibbs
— Dylan GibbsTODAY'S DOCKET6-min readGetting a fair shake in military courtHolding 911 operators accountableOverhauling municipal governmentClearing campus lawnsAnd pre-judging cases with a hot micJUDICIAL INDEPENDENCESCC upholds military court structureR. v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
City of Chicago, No. 08-974 - T VIISee issue description (+briefs links) at SCOTUSblogo SCOTUS docket hereo Noted here: SCOTUSblog (w/ brief links and noting that the Court has invited the views of the SG)2nd CircuitDuffett v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am by Beck, et al.
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 482 F.3d 1187, 1193 (9th Cir. 2007), the plaintiff "ask[ed the court] to blindly accept the [product's] failure before her fracture healed as prima facie evidence that they were defective. [read post]