Search for: "Smith v. South"
Results 201 - 220
of 943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
In the only judgment, Lord Justice Dyson rejects the need for an explicit reference to s.71(1), or required form of words, instead following R (on the application of Lisa Smith) v South Norfolk Council [2006] EWHC 2772 (Admin). [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
He later achieved national fame for representing Homer Plessy in Plessy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:46 am
Smith, COA22-719, ___ N.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi… [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., 173 S.W.3d 212 (Tex.App. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:08 am
Alps South, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Hamil v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
Smith Is blight, like beauty, in the eye of the beholder? [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
(South Carolina) (holding the proper measure of compensation is the difference between the land unencumbered by a railroad easement and the land encumbered by an easement for recreational trail use and railbanking); Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Kentucky and Smith v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:28 am
In Koon v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Reference: Smith v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:12 pm
The proposed class-action lawsuit, known as Diva Limousine v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:36 pm
AND SOUTH PLAINS LAMESA RAILROAD, L.L.C. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:27 am
Unlike FON patrols, the Philippines v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
” Hyland v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
The final argument, in South Carolina v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all… [read post]
