Search for: "State Railroad Tax Cases"
Results 201 - 220
of 449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is Horne, et al., v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
The two cases leading to the Second Circuit’s decision are discussed below. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
The two cases leading to the Second Circuit’s decision are discussed below. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:56 am
With the local economy in shambles, officials argued that attracting a major corporation to the area would increase tax revenue and provide jobs. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am
Circuit, Case No. 13-1093. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:17 am
Texas gives tax incentives for certain oil and gas production. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Yücel is a citizen of Sweden . . ., and was extradited from the Republic of Moldova to the United States in May 2014.U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
The plaintiff, DD, as stated, resides in New Jersey. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
Smith—was widely criticized; both Congress and his own state legislature disowned the result. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:04 am
United States, the “rails to trails” case. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:40 am
The issue in the case was interpretation of Section 11501(b)(4) of the [4-R] Act, which prohibits a state from “impos[ing] another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
It’s a case that requires the Court to interpret the Railroad Revitalization and Regulation Reform Act of 1976, or the so-called 4-R Act. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:33 am
In one of Winslow’s last major cases, State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
At Slate, David Herzig contends that the Court will vote to strike down state bans on same-sex marriage to avoid “large-scale tax problems for tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of taxpayers. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:57 am
The question presented in the case is twofold: (1) whether a state violates the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4-R Act) by “discriminating against a rail carrier” when it requires rail carriers to pay a sales-and-use tax but exempts railroads’ competitors from paying the same tax; and (2) whether, in resolving a claim of unlawful tax discrimination under the 4-R Act, a court should… [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
When railroads purchase diesel fuel, they must pay the tax. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:57 am
Brohl [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court is considering whether the Tax Injunction Act (TIA) [28 USC § 1341] bars federal court jurisdiction over a suit brought by non-taxpayers to enjoin the informational notice and reporting requirements of a state law that neither imposes a tax, nor requires the collection of a tax, but serves only as a secondary... [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
This case is about Section 11501(b)(4) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (the “4-R Act”), which prohibits a state from “impos[ing] another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:01 am
Before 1913, and since 1913, they have been paying federal excise taxes, state property taxes, local property taxes, state sales taxes, occupation taxes, head taxes, and a variety of other taxes.My guess, based on the reference to 1913, is that the author meant to say that “until 1913 Americans did not pay a federal income tax. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 5:17 pm
Hisquierdo, which held that retirement benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act could not be subject to an offset in state-law domestic relations property judgments. [read post]
