Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 12,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
  Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
  Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
As we wrote here, in January 2020, state court Judge William Highberger issued a decision holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (“FAAAA”) preempts use of California’s version of the “ABC” test (as adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:41 pm
California, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, held that a police officer does not have to confirm an anonymous tip of reckless driving before stopping a vehicle. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:21 am by Andrew Thomas
United States District Court for the Central District of California Filed January 23, 2019, Case: 2:19-cv-00505   On January 23, 2019, James Baker, a.k.a. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:00 pm
Levi, Dean andProfessor, Duke Law School, and former Chief Judge, United StatesDistrict Court for the Eastern District of California (Chief Justice) Thomas R. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm by Daniel G.C. Glover
Introduction In a case with several important echoes to Canadian appellate law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has revived the actor’s Hayden Christensen’s “idea theft” lawsuit against the USA Network this week in the Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 4:49 pm by John Steele
The issue in this case is whether the equal rights, privileges andimmunities inherent in bar admission on motion, which the United States SupremeCourt has squarely held is a constitutionally protected privilege and immunity, SupremeCourt of Virginia v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
In 2006, BMPC filed the present lawsuit against DHS in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Yes, the Northern District again!). [read post]