Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross" Results 201 - 220 of 1,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2021, 1:10 pm by Indrasish Majumder
Turkey), the PCIJ said that “the first and main restraint placed by international law upon a state is that a state may not use its authority in any form in the territory of another state. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
In particular, I'll deal with three cross-cutting issues that often arise in these cases: [1.] [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Jan von Hein
The court held that the enforcement provision Article V (1) lit. a New York Convention applies already before or during arbitral proceedings. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 3:20 am by Xandra Kramer
/ p. 532-542 Abstract This article discusses the recent judgment of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
[pdf]  His main conclusion is that the time has come for accredited media representatives to be able, subject to clear rules on maintaining anonymity and confidential details, to report publicly on what they see and hear. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This has more recently been reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
"Activities of a Political Nature": Champaign-Urbana Champaign and Urbana (Ill.), home of the main University of Illinois campus, ban discrimination in public accommodations and real estate (both housing and commercial space) based on "activities of a political nature. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]