Search for: "State of Oregon v. Long" Results 201 - 220 of 981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Phil Dixon
The defendant ultimately pled to second-degree murder in state court for the death. [read post]
  The joint employment doctrine has a long and well-developed history, including numerous interpretative guidance documents issued by the DOL and a multitude of court decisions. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
When not superseded by other statutes, the act specifies whom the president can appoint to fill a vacancy and how long that individual can serve. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:07 am by Derek T. Muller
Utah and Oregon privileged both in-state graduates and a good chunk of out-of-state graduates; Washington and Louisiana privileged essentially all ABA-accredited graduates. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tabatha Abu El-HajIn my last post, I suggested that McKesson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf will testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Aug. 6 regarding the deployment of federal officers to Portland, Oregon. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am by David Super
  None of the six (from Illinois, Kentucky, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Washington) has anything to do with the proposed balanced budget amendment. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
When judicial officers seek to speak out publicly by participating in demonstrations, vigils, protests, or marches, two countervailing interests are at play: the First Amendment rights of the judge versus the state's interest in preserving the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:31 am by Kathryn Mantoan
  Oregon’s recent amendment retains these three defenses and adds five additional categories – i) workplace location; ii) travel, if travel is necessary and regular for the employee; iii) training; iv) experience; or v) any combination of these factors as long as they account for the entire pay differential. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:07 am by Michael Cannan
In a specified perils policy, your insurance carrier explicitly states the causes of property damage, or perils, that it covers. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by Derek T. Muller
I think it would require this “state-specific v. general competence” question to be addressed. [read post]