Search for: "State v. $18,000"
Results 201 - 220
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:41 am
Troia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:31 am
In the case of Washington v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 12:57 pm
Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2015] EMLR 1, Richard v BBC [2019] Ch 169 and Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] 4 WLR 9). [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
By 1905 dual system was accepted. 18,000 registrations by 1880. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
" The petitioners rely heavily on a 1990 California Supreme Court decision, Raven v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:00 pm
As in the Johnson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 1:40 pm
[Disclosure: Dill and I were both expert witnesses on behalf of Jennings and the other plaintiffs in the Jennings v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 4:55 pm
In the case of Odell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
SOMA Environmental Engineering Inc., A123893, the 1st District held that an Alameda County judge erred by reducing a negligence award from $150,000 in damages — including more than $44,500 for past medical expenses — to about $18,000. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm
The limitation on deferrals under Section 457(e)(15) concerning deferred compensation plans of state and local governments and tax-exempt organizations remains unchanged at $16,500. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 11:29 am
The Otay Ranch, L.P. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 6:59 am
STANDARD DEDUCTION v ITEMIZED DEDUCTION Can we still itemize and can still deduct . . . ? [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
Background On AB 5 AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]