Search for: "State v. A. Black Crow" Results 201 - 220 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the state of Michigan in Schuette v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:54 am by Jeff Gamso
  Back in 1999, when the Ohio Supremes affirmed his death sentence in State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:41 am by Clark
Let's start with an easy example: location / observer: Jim Crow south right: right of blacks to attend school as equals social acknowledgement: false gov acknowledgement: false modern view on abstract right: true By this I mean that in the pre-Brown v Board of Ed era in Kansas, blacks did not have the right to attend school as equals according to either the social milieu in Kansas or according to the government in Kansas. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am by Ilya Shapiro
 Moreover, the coverage formula is a Jim Crow anachronism; the racial gap in voter registration and turnout, for example, is lower in states originally covered by Section 5 than nationwide. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm by Scott C. Idleman
United States, which involved the Crow Tribe’s efforts to regulate non-Indian hunting and fishing on non-Indian-owned land within the tribe’s reservation. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:39 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) My contribution to Scotusblog’s symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In the days of Jim Crow, southern states often used facially neutral policies such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and peonage laws to disadvantage blacks. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here they are (results of the first and second series): Match-up No. 9 (3) Ex parte Kan-Gi-Shun-Ca (Crow Dog) defeats (30) United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Match-up No. 9 (3) Ex parte Kan-Gi-Shun-Ca (Crow Dog) (109US556) — No federal jurisdiction over Indian-on-Indian crimes arising in Indian country v. (30) United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm by Ilya Somin
Given my criteria, the Peonage Cases of the early 1900s surely rank high, as they enabled numerous southern blacks to escape a system of forced labor and did so at a time when Jim Crow racism was at its height, and the political branches of government showed little willingness to protect black rights. [read post]