Search for: "State v. A. L. W." Results 201 - 220 of 3,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
{The events giving rise to these two lawsuits occurred in the years preceding the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: Top Marginal State Income Tax Rates Table: 2023 State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets Notable 2023 State Individual Income Tax Changes Historical State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 2015-2023 Individual income taxes are a major source of state government revenue, accounting for 40 percent of state tax collections. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Eleonora Rosati
We have taken the responses seriously […] [W]e do not want to proceed with the original proposals. [read post]