Search for: "State v. Arden"
Results 201 - 220
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 2:41 am
 The facts were as stated in our previous note. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Arden. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
However under the tests set out by Arden J in Hanoman v Southwark L B C [2008] AER(D) 146 [para 47] (our note here), there was a collateral contract in this case, “The terms of the collateral contract can be gleaned from the documents signed by Miss Scrowther, the letter sent by Mr Botsford on 3rd October 2006 and the FAQs and the fact that Miss Scrowther signed the authority and paid over the £31,250 to Watermill on completion”. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
State, 754 N.W.2d 639, 643 (S.D. 2008); Sisney v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:20 pm
Note from an Arden Chambers eflash pdf). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:49 pm
From Arden v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
It would be an undesirable state of affairs if Swindon lost the power to take action against Mr Redpath merely because he had been evicted. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
We first noted Webb v LB Wandsworth [2008] EWCA Civ 1643 in November 2008 when it was discussed in an Arden Chambers eflash. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
That's why each case is titled The People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
On this point Newham relied on Ryan v Islington. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:02 pm
What one conceives well can be stated with clarity and the words to say it come easily. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
The challenge can be on any of the grounds of public law, irrationality, illegality or procedural impropriety (see CCSU and “Doherty: The Facts of the Matter” Andrew Arden QC [2008] 11 JHL 98). [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:12 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:10 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:10 pm
R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC (Admin Court 13 January 2009. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Raulin v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen Case C-357/89 states that duration of work is a finding of fact, but also supports taking the previous wok history into account. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:04 pm
Webb v Wandsworth LBC (Court of Appeal, November 12, 2008, extempore judgment and only noted in Arden Chambers Eflash 328) Ms Webb was the secure tenant of LB Wandsworth. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
Mich-Onyibe v Wandsworth LBC (04/11/08, CA, judgment currently unavailable otherwise than by way of e-flash from Arden Chambers) is a kind of a curious footnote to homelessness law. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:26 pm
The IPKat hadn't forgotten the patent decision last week of the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) in Thorn Security Ltd v Siemens Schweiz AG [2008] EWCA Civ 1161 but there have been so many exciting distractions that he just hadn't got around to posting anything about it yet. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:04 pm
Drury v the Secretary of State[2004] 1 WLR 1906 set out the criterion for prospective possession orders where further acts of trespass are threatened. [read post]
