Search for: "State v. B. Rose" Results 201 - 220 of 636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Norton Rose Fulbright’s Social Media Bulletin has a post considering best practices which licencing trademarks following a case in which involved the use of a trademark on social media was held to be a contractual dispute. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Anzine sent a couple of work spreadsheets to her personal email account, but Judge Kennelly found that no jury could find that this rose to the level of "misappropriation" of a trade secret. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Norton Rose’s Social Media Law Bulletin provides a useful summary of the application of the GDPR and e-Privacy Regulation to social media this week. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d at 65) Because SAi claims that “[b]ut for Furgang’s2 departure from the ordinary standards of professional conduct, SAi would … have [saved] more than $300,000 in legal fees”, SAi states that “‘but for’ [F&A’s] negligence[,] [SAi] … would not have sustained ‘actual and ascertainable’ damages. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
H&F first placed her in a room in ‘Rose Lodge’. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am by MBettman
Rose of the Southern District of Ohio granted the custodians’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for violations of the Ohio Securities Act, R.C. 1707.01 et seq. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am by MBettman
Rose of the Southern District of Ohio granted PENSCO’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for violations of the Ohio Securities Act, R.C. 1707.01 et seq. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Intern Kat Rose discusses its intricacies.In Memoriam Trevor Baylis: the life-saving wind-up radio and the precarious lot of the sole inventor. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:05 am by Terry Hart
The next big shift in the fair use doctrine would come from the introduction of “transformativeness” by the Supreme Court in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music.3510 US 569 (1994). [read post]