Search for: "State v. Blight"
Results 201 - 220
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 7:13 am
The Court of Appeals' 6-1 decision upholding the taking: Goldstein v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:58 am
The order further stated that “lack of maintenance through the years has caused the structure to deteriorate to the point where it is considered not habitable, a public nuisance, a blight to the community and endangerment to the public use of the adjacent bikeway and street. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:21 pm
The council commissioned a study to determine whether the area could be redeveloped under state laws designed to upgrade blighted communities. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
(Marek v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
Monies deposited in the Housing Trust Fund will be allocated to the states on a needbased formula. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:36 am
Acknowledging that generally, traversing stairs is a neutral risk and injuries resulting therefrom are not compensable under the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act, but construing the state’s rules on traveling employees, an Illinois appellate court affirmed a finding of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission that a town’s “blight inspector” was a traveling employee and accordingly, that injuries sustained by him in a fall… [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Of states reporting personal property tax data, state reliance on personal property in 2017 ranged from 1.79 percent to about 29 percent of state property tax bases. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 4:22 am
Cornell Restaurant Ventures v City of Oakland Park, 2017 WL 908196 (11th Cir. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:50 am
Tenth Street Residential Association v City of Dallas, 2020 WL 4435429 (5th Cir. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:15 pm
California Outdoor Equity Partners, LLC v City of Los Angeles, 2015 WL 7259731 (CD CA. 11/16/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Equal Protection, Signs [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
” But the courts upheld it in part on the ground that it was legitimate to take the property to “prevent future blight,” and also to promote economic development, which the Supreme Court recognized as a legitimate public purpose in the controversial decision Kelo v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
So you went to law school right as a generation of legal thinkers was persuading people, bit by bit, that both judicial activism and restraint were misguided, and that courts can and must enforce constitutional limits on the state. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
The federal action was dismissed for failure to state a viable claim that the condemnations violated the Fifth Amendment (see Goldstein v Pataki, 488 F Supp2d 254 [EDNY 2007], affd 516 F3d 50 [2d Cir 2008]). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
V. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:55 am
” In Kelo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:41 pm
(Ilya Somin) In Kaur v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Joyce & Wicked Willow Press, LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:33 pm
Metal Green Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 7:24 pm
The case, City of Austin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 3:51 pm
Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
