Search for: "State v. Briggs" Results 201 - 220 of 337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:04 pm by Addie Rolnick
My critique is really about state law and seeming approval the Court gave S. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm by David Strifling
Briggs, 229 U.S. 82, 88 (1913)). [4] United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by Lovechilde
San Quentin State Prison 40 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
He says that it was not correct of Mr Harris QC to say that much of the evidence has already been gathered to support their methodology. 1235: Mr Hoskins QC says Mr Harris QC’s proposed methodology does not reveal what is practicable at certification stage. 1232: Lord Briggs asks if ‘preferability’ is different to ‘commonality’ in the Canadian legislation. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
Finally, Juror B's email states that the only other juror who began deliberations not already inclined to convict Roy was the juror who failed to show up on Monday and who was replaced by the alternate. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Briggs and City of Chicago v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am by CMS
” In a case law context, the five principles governing estoppel by convention were outlined in the decision of Briggs J in Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Benchdollar [2009] EWHC 1310 (Ch) (“Benchdollar”). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The minority (Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales) would have held that section 32(1)(c) has no application to mistakes of law. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:59 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Below is a brief summary of the cases before the Court: United States v. [read post]