Search for: "State v. Briggs" Results 201 - 220 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
    The rules for the operation of the injunctions for which the Member States must provide are a matter for national law, but those measures must be effective and dissuasive;3. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
CMS Cameron McKenna’s Rob Briggs discusses recent developments here. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm by David Strifling
Briggs, 229 U.S. 82, 88 (1913)). [4] United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am
 That provision states that "the Court of Appeal will seek to take into account the fact that a case was in the Shorter Trials Scheme... [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by INFORRM
Abuse: The judge noted that following the decision of Mr Justice Briggs (as he then was) in Sectorguard Plc v Dienne Plc [2009] EWHC 2693 (Ch) the pursuit of any litigation must be proportionate. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:19 am by Rebecca Davis, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court recently handed down its judgment in the case of Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas Plc [2015] UKSC 71 (read our Case Preview here). [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:37 am by S
They are Hewitt v Rowlands (1924) 93 LJKB 1080, Calabar Properties v Stitcher [1984] 1 WLR 287 , Wallace v Manchester City Council (1998) 30 HLR 1111 and Earle v Charalambous [2007] HLR 8. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 5:20 am by Derek Black
Yesterday, the University of South Carolina announced that it will establish a Center for Civil Rights History and Research to chronicle the contributions of the Palmetto State to the American civil rights movement. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
A case such as Smith v Trafford Housing Trust is less clear cut. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
 Pre-action disclosure is generally "desirable" where the information is only known to one of the parties (see XL London Market v Zenith [2004], Birse v HLC [2006] and Briggs v The Governors of Southfield School for Girls [2005]). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 18 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Ryder and Briggs LJJ) allowed the appeal of Mrs Levi in the case of Levi v Bates. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm by Giles Peaker
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]