Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 201 - 220
of 22,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
In today’s case (Snow v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
See Harrison v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 12:15 am
Garland v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:35 pm
United States Forest Service, No. 08A368. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 5:03 pm
Sales Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 11:14 am
Adobe Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
The court held that, under the comity doctrine, a taxpayer's complaint of allegedly discriminatory state taxation, even when framed as a request to increase a competitor's tax burden, must proceed originally in state court. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:14 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
Cullen v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 8:14 pm
The Utah Court of Appeal issued the decision in State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
United States</i> and <i>Nance v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 6:33 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Burden of proof Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Jaquan Burks, appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder; use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence; possession of a firearm by a prohibited person; and wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun. ... [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:46 am
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Burden of proof On August 20, 1993, John Artis, the appellant, was arrested and charged in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City with multiple handgun offenses and counts of murder under four separate indictments, which resulted in three separate jury trials. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:29 am
It is a 1970, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, State Farm v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:28 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:41 pm
In Washington v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 11:20 am
" However, opined the court, "In New York ... the Legislature—not the Governor—may ordinarily define the terms on which non-constitutional state officers may be appointed and removed.Considering the Plaintiff's secondary arguments, the court decided "the Commission's placement within the Department of State does not violate Article V of the State Constitution. [read post]
