Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 201 - 220
of 13,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2010, 4:14 am
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:02 pm
R. [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:50 pm
C. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
United States, et al. [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:05 am
R. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:56 am
” Linda R. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
C, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Islington (2017) EWHC 1288 (Admin) C was accepted for the full housing duty by Islington, with her 3 children, as a result of domestic violence. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:57 pm
Marinescu v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 3:21 am
R. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:08 pm
By Glen C. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:50 am
Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 N.Y.3d 302John Park, a police officer employed by the Town of Greenburgh, underwent surgery in June 2002 after sustaining an injury in the line of duty. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:08 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 5:24 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Wilkinson, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2733 (11 December 2009) Josephs, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2800 (17 December 2009) Sheppard & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 65 (29 January 2010) C & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 72 (29 January 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Akzo Nobel UK Ltd v Arista Tubes Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 28 (29 January 2010) Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Mark… [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted… [read post]
