Search for: "State v. CC" Results 201 - 220 of 1,542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Since 1/1/2020, the revised  Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA2020) are in force. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
A New York state appeals court on upheld the dismissal of a defamation suit targeting WPIX-TV and its reporter Magee Hickey over a 2014 story that misi [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, Jan. 21, 10:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will hold a book event for “Unmaking the Presidency” by Lawfare’s Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:27 am
  Concerned the interpretation of permitted, non-commercial activity under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, this case resembles and is, in fact, intertwined with Great Minds v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The RSVP deadline is Jan. 16, not Jan.14 as stated in the flier. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Hannah Kris
Thursday, Jan. 9, 2:00 p.m.: The Atlantic Council will be hosting a conversation on the United States’ relations with Iraq and Iran following recent developments in the region. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Giles Peaker
And the effect of the Supreme Court decision in Nzolameso v City of Westminster CC (2015) UKSC 22 (our post) is that an applicant who is offered accommodation outside the authority’s district may seek a review of the decision on grounds of suitability even though a decision to exercise the power contained in s.208(2) is not included in the list of reviewable decisions under s.202. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:17 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
DocumentsAlthough the parties' requests referred to documents D9 to D16 of the opposition proceedings (see point V above), only documents D9 and D14 are relevant for the present decision.1.1 Documents D9 and D14 were filed after the nine-months opposition period according to Article 99(1) EPC (impugned decision, points I.4, I.7 and I.9). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The passage at column 6, lines 47 to 49 states that:"The heat source 17 for heating a refrigerant can adjust the amount of heat when necessary".This sentence taken alone directly and unambiguously discloses at least that the heat source 17 is not necessarily operated. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
The Court was then reinforcing the weight to be attached to the medical evidence and adding just a little further nuance to the guidance in Shala v Birmingham CC about the way in which reviewing officers should approach the medical evidence. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
Cas. 210, 211 (No. 15,906) (CC Mass. 1855); United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:06 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
*New Case Law The California Court of Appeal recently ruled on the case of Eisen v. [read post]