Search for: "State v. Calvin" Results 201 - 220 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by Bexis
 We made our best Calvin and Hobbes face at this unappetising decision here.2. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
Box 16520 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Phone: (877) 543-7669 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.utahchip.org Hearing Impairments Programs for Individuals who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Utah Community Center of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Utah State Office of Rehabilitation 5709 South 1500 West Salt Lake City, UT 84123 Phone: (801) 263-4860 (V/TTY); (800) 860-4860 (V/TTY/Toll Free in UT only) Web: http://www.usor.state.ut.us/dsdhh/dsdhh.html State Agency for Individuals… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:39 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
The first case, which bore Senator Byrd's name — Raines v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Between 2007 and 2008, Tesoro’s employee in charge of credit, Calvin Leav [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Zoe Tillman
Second, they argued that prosecutors withheld potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of the precedent set in Brady v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by John Bursch
  In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]