Search for: "State v. Central Computer Services, Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
CALIFORNIA UCP AFFILIATES UCP affiliates provide direct services to individuals and families with cerebral palsy and other disabilities. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
Random House, Inc.[10] and in New Era Publications Int'l v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Relying on the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:43 pm
The central problem with the potential case of FTC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Google, Inc., 2007 U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
The Spanish Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Google Spain on the right to be forgotten, which means that claims concerning the right to be forgotten should be submitted directly to Google Inc in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
(collectively, “Apple”) and the Respondents are High Tech Computer Corp., HTC America Inc., and Exedia, Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
E-mail: yvonne@tdoa.state.tx.us Texas Department on Aging 4900 North Lamar, 4th Floor Austin, TX 78751-2316 Phone: (512)424-6840; (800) 252-9240 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.tdoa.state.tx.us/index.htm AARP Texas 98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 750 Austin, TX 78701 Phone: (512) 480-9797 Fax: (512) 480-9799 Web: http://www.aarp.org/states/tx ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Disability Law Resource Project 2323 South Shepard Boulevard, Suite 1000 Houston, TX… [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
Even if they are correct, the parties pressing for government antitrust action against Google cannot claim the courts have ever recognized the concept of natural monopoly as a surrogate for the United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
v=qlRtLGorhdY Pricing: Per month per user fees. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The central revenue feature of Ohio House Bill 66 of 2005 (which was also the biennial budget), the Commercial Activity Tax was designed to phase in as corporation franchise and tangible personal property taxes phased out. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Asssoc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Holland 1916 Inc., failed to file disclosure reports with federal and state agencies for three years, according to a consent agreement with the Environmental Protectio [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Thompson's presentation of Blawg Review #213 at Cyberlaw Central. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Thompson's presentation of Blawg Review #213 at Cyberlaw Central. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Continuing the tradition of a unanimous ruling for a first opinion, the decision in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
