Search for: "State v. City of Phoenix"
Results 201 - 220
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 4:18 pm
Thus, holding that the Arizona Constitution affords greater protections in some circumstances citing Arizona v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
S.R.L. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Arch Wireless Operating Co., 529 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2008); City of Ontario v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, DeVillier v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
ESTAuburn Tigers (10) v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm
” ______________________________________________________________ [1] City of Tyler v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:19 am
United States Bank Nat. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
She called Lithwick, who lives there, asking her help in finding local plaintiffs who could protest their injuries caused by the demonstrators.Everyone let the victims down in this case; the “police, the courts, the university, the city, and the state had all let Charlottesville down, as had the federal government. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:16 am
Thoughts from the Digital Samurai - http://tinyurl.com/34qvgqs Texas State Bar Releases 63,000 Lawyer E-Mail Addresses to Law Student - http://ow.ly/18ENnA What Lawyers Need to Know About Search Tools - http://tinyurl.com/2clo7kg Worldmark v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Click Here Fulfilling sewer pact to cost city $3.5 billion. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:08 am
This was one of the main reasons relied upon by the Judge in OTG v Barke. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:09 am
A private criminal defense attorney works for you, not the state, not the public defender's office, not the city---just you. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:58 am
A private criminal defense attorney works for you, not the state, not the public defender's office, not the city---just you. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm
Nonetheless, given the “vast power” of the administrative state, the digital platforms did not sue the government for violating their First Amendment rights, apparently believing that it just wasn’t worth it to fight City Hall (hence the problem of the petitioners’ lack of standing in Murthy). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Hogan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARECONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUPlaintiff,v.THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTER STUDENT LOAN TRUST, et al.Defendants.C.A. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARECONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUPlaintiff,v.THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTER STUDENT LOAN TRUST, et al.Defendants.C.A. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Liberation Music settled Lawrence Lessig's August 2013 federal complaint which said that the music company were wrong to force the take down of one of Lessig's lectures from YouTube that featured clips of user-generated videos showing people dancing to Phoenix’s track “Lisztomania”. [read post]
