Search for: "State v. Cochran"
Results 201 - 220
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 1:06 pm
Today, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals released Meekins v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:08 am
Last year I wrote about Byrd v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Clearly, the decision in Pinnock meant that things had moved on since Cochrane and McLellan. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Clearly, the decision in Pinnock meant that things had moved on since Cochrane and McLellan. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:05 am
Quoted in Cochran v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
The Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Lykos v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:16 am
Last Friday the Third Court of Appeals at Austin affirmed a Travis County trial court’s ruling granting a same-sex divorce in Texas, State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:12 am
State. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:12 am
State. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
And as the Supreme Court said in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:53 pm
Liberty and Justice for Y'all brings word of an important new case from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (Cardenas v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:26 am
State, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that, under the cognate pleadings approach to one-step lesser-included-offenses (see Hall v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Fibre Disintegrating Co., 90 U.S. 566 (1874) (pure cellulose pulp preparation prepared by novel chemical process held not novel over prior art cellulose pulp preparations made by old process); Cochrane v. [read post]
